Surprise, surprise... guess who's running for president! Barack Obama. I swear, I never saw that one coming.
I know the Democratic base loves him. Heck according to most polls, America loves him. But I gotta say, I still am not loving him. I have yet to hear him clearly articulate a single policy stance. What does he stand for? Universal health care? Gay marriage? The end of farm subsidies? All I know is Barack wants our troops home starting in May, and he never would have voted for the Iraq War. Well... that is easy to say when you weren't there...
The thing that bothers me the most of Obama's Iraq position, and this holds other Democrats with similar positions on Iraq (e.g., Murtha, Edwards, et al.), is what happens when we do pull out of Iraq? Will Iraq magically fix itself? or will it turn into the next Iraq? Or better yet will it turn into some sort of Valley of Death, ala Afghanistan, where Iran, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia all come in to secure their interests? I am not really sure, and I would rather not find out. The US needs to find a way to work with other governments in the region. All the countries in the region have some vested interest in seeing a stable Iraq. Let's get them to the table and talk about how to secure the country. Let's get some monetary and military commitments. Leaving cold turkey is no solution.
Personally, at the moment if push comes to shove, I'd vote Edwards. I don't feel solid about his Iraq position, but I am inclined to think he is pandering to the liberal base and knows it. Besides which, Hillary gives Republicans and Independents the heebejeebes. Voting for her in the primaries would be a waste come a general election. But Edwards has real positions, is a great public speaker, and I think his populist platform sits well with the general electorate. Most importantly, he is a Southern Democrat and there is a real possibility he could turn a few of those states Blue.
Also slamming Democrats really just does not sit well with me. I feel like there is plenty to chastise Republicans for. Especially those Republicans who ran on "moderate" platforms for most of their careers as public servants. McCain in my opinion was always a wolf in sheep's clothing. He is not really a moderate Republican. He is conservative to the core, he just managed to pull the wool over everyones' eyes. But Rudy and Mitt are a different story all together. Rudy has always been a pro-choice, pro-gun control, pro-gay rights politician. Highly commendable stances in my opinion, and vital to survive in the City. Romney was also a moderate when he ran for governor. But it is a testament to the power of the crazy conservative Republican base that post politicians have been revisiting their social policy stances. Talk about flip-floppers. Karl Rove, cat got your tongue?
Saturday, February 10, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Mccain is libertarian more than anything...No one says he is moderate...but he is a "true" conservative. he is against big government etc....but he is also against the gay marriage ammendment because he doesn't feel it is a federal issue...so He is very libertarian in his beliefs.
I like Richardson for his experience but he can't get past the stars. Edwards is OK too. I am not at all comfortable with Hillary, she is too scripted.
Esha - I know a lot of people believe that John McCain is a libertarian. But I am just not buying.
Not only is he against gay marriage (and let it be known that his reason for why he is against it changes depending on whether he is running for election), but he is also for a reversal of Roe v. Wade, for campaign finance reform (which I actually like), not against the 'illegal' wiretaps, etc.
I think McCain does a great job of trying to be a libertarian. He certainly seemed like one back in 2000, but these days I am not sure... could be he is just a flip-flopper, but remember us Americans don't like them either.
Post a Comment